POTUS 2020, part 1

A place to bring a contemplative / Dharmic perspective and opinions to current events, politics and economics.
User avatar
Kim O'Hara
Posts: 1134
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:07 am
Location: Tropical Queensland, Australia

Re: POTUS 2020, part 1

Post by Kim O'Hara » Fri Jun 14, 2019 7:20 am

Donald Trump could be in re-election trouble, the polls say. Here's why you shouldn't believe them
:reading: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-14/ ... s/11208412

:coffee:
Kim

User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:49 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: POTUS 2020, part 1

Post by DNS » Sat Jun 29, 2019 2:08 am


User avatar
SethRich
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 8:57 pm

Re: POTUS 2020, part 1

Post by SethRich » Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:14 am

Greetings,

OUT: Eric "Nuke 'Em" Swalwall has dropped out of the running.

IN: Tom Steyer is apparently now in the running... but I have a feeling this man may have a few skeletons in his closet.

:spy:

:candle:
"Let us neither be perpetrators nor victims!" (DN26)

:candle: "...his name was Seth Rich..."

User avatar
Kim O'Hara
Posts: 1134
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:07 am
Location: Tropical Queensland, Australia

Re: POTUS 2020, part 1

Post by Kim O'Hara » Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:52 pm

DNC Shuts Down Climate Debate Compromise

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) will not let 2020 primary candidates share the stage in a debate devoted to the climate crisis, the party voted Saturday during its summer meeting in San Francisco.

The DNC resolutions committee had already voted against holding a party-sanctioned debate on the topic Thursday, but it did approve language that would have allowed candidates to speak face-to-face on the issue at a third-party sponsored event. That compromise was voted down 222-137 Saturday, CNN reported. CNN and MSNBC both plan to hold climate forums in September, but the candidates will have to speak separately and will not be able to engage each other.

"This decision is as baffling as it is alarming," candidate and former Texas Representative Beto O'Rourke tweeted of the decision. "Our planet is burning—the least we can do as a party is debate what to do about it." ...

Climate activists like the youth-led Sunrise Movement have been mobilizing for a climate-specific debate for months, and most of the candidates have said they would participate, but top DNC officials, including Chair Tom Perez, have argued that it is unfair to single out one issue for discussion over others, The Mercury News reported.

"We want to make sure we don't change the rules in the middle of the process," Perez said Saturday, as The Mercury News reported. "We have a North Star principle: We want to be fair to everyone."

But others argued that the climate crisis is not just another issue.

"If an asteroid was coming to earth, there would be no question about having a debate about it," Kansas DNC member Chris Reeves said, as The Mercury News reported. "But with this existential crisis facing the world, we all sit and wring our hands."

The debate at the meeting Saturday was interrupted by protesters chanting "We can't wait" and "Failure of leadership."

"The Democratic Party needs the energy, motivation, and organizing capacity of young people to defeat Trump in 2020. But Tom Perez keeps shooting the party in the foot by rejecting that energy and turning it away," the Sunrise Movement said in a statement Saturday ...
:reading: https://www.ecowatch.com/dnc-climate-de ... belltitem1

:toilet:
Kim

User avatar
SethRich
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 8:57 pm

Re: POTUS 2020, part 1

Post by SethRich » Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:38 am

Greetings,

I don't think these Democratic debates are doing the Democrats much good. It seems the setting, the format and the audience reactions are just encouraging them to "out-woke" each other and put the policy platform of the party further to the left. Not to be left behind, each candidate seems to be following and goading each other off the edge of a cliff.

A summary of their positions from July, courtesy of Brain Cates...
Here’s a brief rundown of the litany of topics where these 20 candidates stand on issues:

Tax Increases: Repeal the Trump tax cuts and raise taxes on the middle class.
Open Borders: Cease all border enforcement and even take down the sections of the border wall that have already been constructed.
Abortion extremism: Candidates affirmed that they want no limits whatsoever on legal abortion, which means abortions into the third trimester.
Climate Change: Many think global warming is the biggest threat facing the world today and would attempt to implement the disastrous Green New Deal.
Obamacare 2.0: Take away private health care plans and force everyone in the country into a state-run health care system. Also, raise taxes on U.S. taxpayers in order to pay for health care coverage for millions of illegal immigrants.
Gun control: Bring back the “assault weapons ban.” One of the candidates, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) has made gun control his signature issue, boasting that he would ban all “assault weapons” and then pay citizens to hand them over.
Reparations: A massive new government program to transfer taxpayer money to the descendants of former slaves.
Gender insanity: Candidate Julian Castro claimed he would protect the right of trans men to have abortions.
I'm yet to find a current comparable list, but I will keep an eye out.

Either way, he observes later in his piece that...
The conventional wisdom is that candidates vying for a party’s nomination during the primary season make direct appeals to the base. Then, during the general election phase, the nominee works to hold the base that nominated them, while simultaneously trying to attract independents and crossover votes from the other party. They accomplish this by shifting to the center.
However, the further they go to the left to start with, the further they have to shift in order to return to the centre. Have they somehow caught on to a winning strategy that I'm yet to cognize, or are they just setting themselves up for a trouncing?

:popcorn:

:candle:
"Let us neither be perpetrators nor victims!" (DN26)

:candle: "...his name was Seth Rich..."

User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:49 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: POTUS 2020, part 1

Post by DNS » Sat Sep 14, 2019 3:45 pm

Michael Moore was on Bill Maher's show last night and they were arguing about which is better, to nominate a far-leftist or someone more of a centrist. Maher was arguing for a centrist. See from 5:00 mark:


User avatar
SethRich
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 8:57 pm

Re: POTUS 2020, part 1

Post by SethRich » Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:02 am

Greetings DNS,

It appears the video has been taken down.

:candle:
"Let us neither be perpetrators nor victims!" (DN26)

:candle: "...his name was Seth Rich..."

User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:49 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: POTUS 2020, part 1

Post by DNS » Sun Sep 15, 2019 3:16 pm

SethRich wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:02 am
Greetings DNS,

It appears the video has been taken down.

:candle:
Here's another user uploading it, let's see if this one lasts.



from 5:30 mark

User avatar
SethRich
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 8:57 pm

Re: POTUS 2020, part 1

Post by SethRich » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:41 am

Alas, no...

:candle:
"Let us neither be perpetrators nor victims!" (DN26)

:candle: "...his name was Seth Rich..."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests